VOX POP
Political parties have been up in arms against ECN's decision to hand-pick an SA company to print the ballot papers for this year's elections. Do you think their concerns are valid and what is your take on how ECN is handling this matter?
Joe-Chintha Garises
The concerns raised by political parties regarding the ECN decision to select a South African company for ballot paper printing are valid, especially in terms of transparency and trust in the electoral process. The ECN should ensure clear communication about the selection process, including the criteria used and the reasons for choosing a foreign company. Additionally, involving local companies where possible could bolster support for the ECN and the electoral system as a whole.
Connie Visagie
Seeing that the South African-based company, Ren-Form CC, is marred by N$570 million corruption allegations, I do believe the political parties' concerns are valid. The ECN is not acting in the public's interest, as it continues to proceed with a company that lacks transparent good standing, despite public outcry.
Francois du Plessis
These are not light allegations made against the company that was further hand-picked by the commission. The ECN should maintain standards and the objectives of transparency and accountability.
Sylvia Konata
The concerns raised by political parties against Ren-Form CC are valid, given the historical context of election rigging allegations in Namibia and Africa. While the electoral commission's efforts to promote transparency are commendable, simply labelling a company as the "most responsive bidder" without clear justification raises suspicion. Full transparency in the selection process is crucial to maintain trust in the election's integrity. The ECN should provide detailed explanations to avoid fuelling doubts about potential bias.
Cecilia Nuuyoma
It is valid for political parties to raise concerns, as elections are meant to be free and fair. However, we must also consider this: if we are questioning the decisions made by the Electoral Commission of Namibia, does that imply there is a deeper issue within the commission? If so, does the perceived lack of transparency suggest that the ECN is acting in favour of a particular political party likely to win? Ultimately, do these doubts lead us to conclude that a party may have undue influence or control over the ECN’s operations?
The concerns raised by political parties regarding the ECN decision to select a South African company for ballot paper printing are valid, especially in terms of transparency and trust in the electoral process. The ECN should ensure clear communication about the selection process, including the criteria used and the reasons for choosing a foreign company. Additionally, involving local companies where possible could bolster support for the ECN and the electoral system as a whole.
Connie Visagie
Seeing that the South African-based company, Ren-Form CC, is marred by N$570 million corruption allegations, I do believe the political parties' concerns are valid. The ECN is not acting in the public's interest, as it continues to proceed with a company that lacks transparent good standing, despite public outcry.
Francois du Plessis
These are not light allegations made against the company that was further hand-picked by the commission. The ECN should maintain standards and the objectives of transparency and accountability.
Sylvia Konata
The concerns raised by political parties against Ren-Form CC are valid, given the historical context of election rigging allegations in Namibia and Africa. While the electoral commission's efforts to promote transparency are commendable, simply labelling a company as the "most responsive bidder" without clear justification raises suspicion. Full transparency in the selection process is crucial to maintain trust in the election's integrity. The ECN should provide detailed explanations to avoid fuelling doubts about potential bias.
Cecilia Nuuyoma
It is valid for political parties to raise concerns, as elections are meant to be free and fair. However, we must also consider this: if we are questioning the decisions made by the Electoral Commission of Namibia, does that imply there is a deeper issue within the commission? If so, does the perceived lack of transparency suggest that the ECN is acting in favour of a particular political party likely to win? Ultimately, do these doubts lead us to conclude that a party may have undue influence or control over the ECN’s operations?
Comments
Namibian Sun
No comments have been left on this article