Election promises: Should voters be excited or worried?

As we approach yet another election period, the air is thick with anticipation. Politicians from across the spectrum are unveiling their manifestos, each one filled with lofty promises aimed at captivating the electorate and winning votes. Yet as voters prepare to head to the polls, one pertinent question remains: should we be excited or worried about these promises?Election promises, often characterised by their grandiose nature, can elicit a spectrum of emotions. On one hand, they can imbue hope, inspire change, and promise progress. Job creation, improved healthcare, education reform and poverty reduction are all themes we’ve heard before and continue to hear in this electoral season. For many voters, these promises signal a path toward a brighter future, filled with opportunities and advancements.However, the other side of the coin reveals a growing scepticism among the electorate. In a time of heightened political polarisation and economic uncertainty, the reliability of these promises is under scrutiny. The concerns are valid, as historical precedents indicate that political pledges often remain unfulfilled. Past election promises are making some voters feel disillusioned by the political process, believing that political parties fail to deliver on their commitments after winning office. Accountability issueVoters’ worries stem from several issues. First and foremost is the record of accountability. Many voters are weary of promises that go unfulfilled. In the past, administrations have routinely made commitments that either get sidetracked by political diplomacy or simply fade away. The concept of “broken promises” has become so ingrained in political discourse that it now shapes how a political party is received even before they take office.Take, for example, the issue of poverty reduction. Politicians across the political spectrum have made grand claims about their commitment to reduce poverty and unemployment, yet many of these promises have lacked follow-through when faced with challenges. With recent reports of malnourished children and people being poisoned due to lack of food, voters often feel that the bold declarations made during campaign rallies do not translate effectively into real actions.Economic constraintsAnother reason to approach election promises with caution is the impact of economic constraints. The state of the economy heavily influences the feasibility of these promises. With inflation rates persisting at elevated levels and a looming drought threatening many citizens, many potential initiatives may become impractical. Voters need to consider whether the promises made during campaigns can realistically be met amidst economic realities. A promise of quality healthcare or creation of jobs, for example, requires a stable economic base, which is currently precarious.Moreover, there is a growing concern about the overall transparency of political campaigns. The increasing role of money in politics can skew priorities, leading politicians to prioritise the interests of a few wealthy donors over the needs of their constituents. As campaign financing becomes increasingly convoluted, voters must grapple with the question of whose interests are truly being served. Political parties or presidential candidates may present promises that sound good on the surface but serve underlying agendas that do not align with the public interest.The complexityCompounding these issues is another layer of complexity. Political promises are often intertwined with a strong emotional appeal. Campaigns harness powerful narratives that can often polarise voters. This, in turn, can lead to another issue, which is the crowding out of nuanced discussions in favour of sound bites and flashy promises. As certain themes dominate the conversation, critical issues may go overlooked. Voters may find themselves caught up in the excitement of emotional appeals, losing sight of practicalities and realities.Nevertheless, voters should not dismiss all election promises outright, as this can serve as a litmus test for the values and priorities of political parties. A commitment to social justice, inclusiveness, and quality service delivery still resonates with a significant portion of the electorate. Engaging with candidates who genuinely strive to address the pressing issues of our time can lead to progress and positive change.Active approach criticalTo navigate this landscape, voters should take an active approach. Researching political parties and their candidates&#039; track records, understanding their platforms in detail and demanding accountability can help bridge the gap between promises and reality. Constructive engagement during meetings can foster a sense of responsibility, encouraging voters to become stakeholders in the political process rather than passive recipients of promises.In conclusion, as the election draws near, the duality of promise and peril remains ever-present. While the excitement surrounding election promises can be contagious, voters should remain vigilant and be prepared to ask the hard questions. For in this journey toward democracy, the responsibility lies equally on voters to discern truth from rhetoric. In the end, it is the collective engagement and accountability of the electorate that will shape the political narrative, pushing political parties to turn promises into tangible outcomes and, ideally, a better society for all.As we prepare to cast our votes on 27 November, the call to action is clear: Let’s not only seek hope in election promises, but also demand a clear plan that holds our leaders accountable.*Faustinus Shikukutu is an educator by experience and a resident of Kavango East Region. All views expressed are his own.#NamibiaDecides2024

Election promises: Should voters be excited or worried?

Comments

Namibian Sun 2025-04-04

Please login to leave a comment

Election promises: Should voters be excited or worried?

Comments

Namibian Sun 2025-04-04

Please login to leave a comment

Login