Claims of white genocide 'not real', South African court rules

A South African court has dismissed claims of a white genocide in the country as "clearly imagined" and "not real", undermining comments made by US President Donald Trump and his adviser Elon Musk.The ruling came as the court blocked a wealthy benefactor's donation to white supremacist group Boerelegioen.Grantland Michael Bray wanted to bequeath US$2.1m ( £1.7m) to the group to help it "further its messages of racial hatred and separation".But the court ruled this request was invalid, vague and "contrary to public policy".Trump has referred to the "large-scale killing of farmers" in South Africa, while Musk has condemned what he said were "racist ownership laws" and previously condemned the "genocide of white people".Despite vowing to crack down on immigration, Trump has said that white South African farmers would be allowed to settle in the US as refugees because of the persecution he said they faced.Musk was born and grew up in South Africa before moving to the US.The court action was brought by Gray's four siblings, who are also trustees and beneficiaries of the family trust.In it, they claimed that their brother had become "obsessed with the idea of an impending genocide of white people in South Africa" in the last 10 years of his life.He died in March 2022.Paranoid white supremacistGray, who was paralysed following an accident aged 26 while doing military service, had also become paranoid, believing the supposed "genocide" would occur soon."That idea was further fuelled by his already present racism and the online content that he was exposed to," Judge Rosheni Allie summarised in a 15 February ruling that has just come to light.Gray first met members of the Boerelegioen in 2020 and allegedly gave them about US$326 000 (£258,000) in gold coins to help fund their cause and gain membership of the racist group.The Boerelegioen describes itself as a "civil defence movement that enables citizens to resist the promised slaughter of whites in RSA [Republic of South Africa] as well as the theft of their property".Racial hatredGray subsequently made the organisation a beneficiary to his estate, specifying that a portion of the money go towards the various training programmes the group ran.But because there were three entities all bearing the Boerelegioen name, the court found that Gray's bequest made was "vague concerning which entity was the intended beneficiary" of his will."The only expression of the [Gray's] intention that is evident is the intention for the funds to be used for 'training' as well as [his] own assertions that he wanted the funds used to benefit an organisation which he deemed to be one which will exterminate every black person in South Africa and will be used to defend or ward off a white genocide, which is clearly imagined and not real," Judge Allie said.On the public policy issue, Gray's siblings contended that Boerelegioen wanted to use the funds to "further... its messages of racial hatred and separation".Boerelegioen says it simply provides security and training services to communities and does not exclude anyone on the basis of race, gender or religion.Judge Allie ruled in favour of the siblings and ordered Boerelegioen to pay the costs in the court case.

Claims of white genocide 'not real', South African court rules

Comments

Namibian Sun 2025-02-27

Please login to leave a comment

Claims of white genocide 'not real', South African court rules

Comments

Namibian Sun 2025-02-27

Please login to leave a comment

Login